CORLEY et al v. LONG-LEWIS, INC et al
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFTS' JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #38) IS GRANTED. DEFTS' OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #78) ARE OVERRULED AND DEFTS' JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #40) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJDUICE, WITH LEAVE TO RE-FILE IN THE TRANSFEROR COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/25/2011. 7/29/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(tomg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS
:
LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI) :
:
CHARLES CORLEY, et al.
:
:
:
v.
:
:
:
LONG-LEWIS, INC., et al.
:
Consolidated Under
MDL DOCKET NO. 875
Civil Action No. 10-61113
Transferred from the
Northern District of
Alabama
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2011 it is hereby ORDERED
that Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report
and Recommendation (doc. no. 84) filed on June 2, 2011 are
OVERRULED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion for
Summary Judgment (doc. no. 38) is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Objections to
Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 78)
are OVERRULED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion for
Summary Judgment (doc. no. 40) is DENIED without prejudice, with
leave to re-file in the transferor court.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?