CORLEY et al v. LONG-LEWIS, INC et al

Filing 87

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFTS' JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #38) IS GRANTED. DEFTS' OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #78) ARE OVERRULED AND DEFTS' JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #40) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJDUICE, WITH LEAVE TO RE-FILE IN THE TRANSFEROR COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/25/2011. 7/29/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS : LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI) : : CHARLES CORLEY, et al. : : : v. : : : LONG-LEWIS, INC., et al. : Consolidated Under MDL DOCKET NO. 875 Civil Action No. 10-61113 Transferred from the Northern District of Alabama O R D E R AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2011 it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 84) filed on June 2, 2011 are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 38) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 78) are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 40) is DENIED without prejudice, with leave to re-file in the transferor court. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?