FAISON et al v. KAISER ALUMINUM CORP. et al

Filing 7

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S PLEADINGS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/26/10. 8/27/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(fb)

FAISON et al v. KAISER ALUMINUM CORP. et al

Doc. 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW FAISON, JR., et. al., Petitioners, v. KAISER ALUMINUM CORP., et. al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of Petitioner's first Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's second Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 3), and the Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner with his first Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 5), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED; 2. Petitioner's pleadings are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. Civil Action Case No. 10-MC-51

-12-

Dockets.Justia.com