LEE v. JACKSON et al

Filing 39

AMENDED ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNTS I & II IS DENIED. DEFTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS & AGAINST PLFF ON ALL COUNTS; & THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/16/13. 5/16/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CESAR LEE, Plaintiff. v. LISA P. JACKSON, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : Civ. No. 11-195 AMENDED ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2013, my Order of May 14, 2013 is hereby amended and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Counts I and II (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED; 2. Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED; 3. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all Counts; and 4. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond ____________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?