WASHINGTON v. HANSHAW et al

Filing 31

ORDER THAT FOR REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM OF LAW BEARING TODAY'S DATE, THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED ON THE CLAIM OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ON THE ISSUE OF LIABILITY UNDER MONNEL. THE COURT WILL HOLD A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH THE PARTIES ON 5/29/2012 AT 4:30 TO DISCUSS SCHEDULING THE REMAINDER OF THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 5/11/12. 5/11/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON
v.
LEO HANSHAW, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-254

ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2012, upon consideration
of the Upper Darby Police Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(Docket No. 17) and the opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s
date, that the defendant’s motion is DENIED on the claim of
qualified immunity and DENIED without prejudice on the issue of
liability under Monell.
The Court will hold a telephone conference with the
parties on May 29, 2012 at 4:30 to discuss scheduling the
remainder of this case.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the

call.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.