WASHINGTON v. HANSHAW et al
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 37 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE, DEFENDANTS' REPLY, AND PLAINTIFF'S SUR-REPLY, AND FOLLOWING ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE MOTIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/12/12. 12/12/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DETECTIVE LEO HANSHAW, et al.
AND NOW, this 12th day of December 2012, upon consideration of the
motion for judgment on the pleadings and renewed motion for summary judgment filed
by Defendants (Doc. 37), Plaintiff’s response, Defendants’ reply, and Plaintiff’s surreply, and following oral argument on the motions, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the
motions are GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants
Detective Leo Hanshaw, Detective William Kane, Officer Steven O’Connor and the
Township of Upper Darby, and against Plaintiff Christopher Washington.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ ELIZABETH T. HEY
ELIZABETH T. HEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?