BRIDGEFORD v. VARANO et al
ORDER THAT: THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/15/12. 8/15/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID VARANO, et al
AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (Document No. 9), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Document No. 12), the petitioner’s objections to the
Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record,
it is ORDERED that:
The petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?