ROYSTER v. COMMONWEALTH
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THE MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS (DOC.NOS. 8, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20) FILED BY PETITIONER ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 4/3/12. 4/3/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIROSA LAMAS, et al.,
AND NOW, this
, 2012, upon consideration
of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket Nos. 1, 3), Petitioner's Memorandum ofLaw
(Docket Nos. 9, 11), and Respondents' Response (Docket No. 14), and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge HenryS. Perkin dated March 13, 2012,
IT IS ORDERED that:
the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and
DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing;
the miscellaneous motions filed by Petitioner, including: (1) Motion for
Default against Marirosa Lamas and others (Document No.8); (2) two Motions for Summons
Enforcement Proceedings (Document Nos. 15, 16); (3) Motion to Strike a state petition
(Document No. 17); (4) Request for this Court to Enforce a Request for Information from Darby
Borough Police Department pursuant to the Right to Know Law (Document No. 19); and (5)
Motion for Charge Account Records (Document No. 20) are DENIED with prejudice; and
the Clerk of Court shall mark this action CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?