REICHERT v. THE PATHWAY SCHOOL et al

Filing 65

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 40) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AGAINST WENDY REICHERT. DEFENDANT PATHWAY SCHOOL'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 43) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/26/2013. 3/27/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WENDY REICHERT
v.
THE PATHWAY SCHOOL
et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-622

ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2013, upon
consideration of a) the defendant Garnet Valley School District’s
motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 40); and b) the defendant
Pathway School’s motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No.
43), and the briefs in support of and in opposition to these
motions, and following an oral argument on February 15, 2013,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a
memorandum of law bearing today’s date, that defendant Garnet
Valley School District’s motion is GRANTED.

Judgment is ENTERED

in favor of Garnet Valley School District and against Wendy
Reichert.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the
same memorandum of law, that defendant Pathway School’s motion
for partial summary judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.