POSTIGLIONE et al v. CROSSMARK, INC.

Filing 69

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THEIR RENEWED MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF NARROWING THE CLASS (DOC. NO. 65), IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AND COLLECTI VE CLASS (DOC. NO. 34) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (DOC. NO. 57) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ALL OF THE PLAINTIFFS OTHER THAN JAMES POSTIGLIONE ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL AMEND THE CAPTION AS FOLLOWS: JAMES POSTIGLIONE V. CROSSMARK, INC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 11/14/2012. 11/16/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES POSTIGLIONE, et al,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CROSSMARK, INC.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 11-960

ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2012:
1. Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend (paper no. 65), motion to
certify a conditional class (paper no. 34), and motion to compel (paper no. 57), and Defendant’s
responses thereto, it is ORDERED that:
a. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their Renewed Motion for Conditional Class
Certification for the Purpose of Narrowing the Class (paper no. 65) is DENIED.
b. Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Conditional Certification of Collective Class (paper
no. 34) is DENIED.
c. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and to Compel Production of
Documents (paper no. 57) is DENIED without prejudice.
2. All of the plaintiffs other than James Postiglione are DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. The Clerk of Court shall amend the caption as follows:
JAMES POSTIGLIONE
v.
CROSSMARK, INC.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 11-960

/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
J.