BAILEY v. HALEY et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #12) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO MOVE FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (DOC. #16) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 3/22/2012; 3/23/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TORI BAILEY, Plaintiff v. LYNDA M. HALEY, ET AL., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-1153 ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of March 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 12) and Plaintiff’s Response thereto (Doc. 15), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Move for Class Certification (Doc. 16) is DENIED as MOOT.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ________________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 1 2 This Order accompanies a memorandum opinion issued by the Court on March __. 2012. Because this Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as set forth above, Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Move for Class Certification (Doc. 16) is moot.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?