SHER et al v. UPPERMORELAND TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFFS CANNOT REPRESENT THE MINOR-PLAINTIFF AND CANNOT STATE A CLAIM ON HIS BEHALF. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT MINOR-PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO APPOINT COUNSEL FOR MINOR-PLAINTIFF IS HEREBY DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 8/19/2011. 8/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(stwe, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VAN C. SHER and CAROL L. SHER
on behalf of themselves and their minor son,
UPPER MORELAND TOWNSHIP SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.
AND NOW this 19th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss
submitted by Upper Moreland Township School District, Robert Milrod, and Howard Cohen
(“Defendants”) (Doc. No. 2) and the response thereto submitted by Plaintiffs Van C. Sher and
Carol L. Sher (“Plaintiffs”), it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiffs, Van C. Sher and Carol L. Sher’s claims are DISMISSED WITH
Plaintiffs Van C. Sher and Carol L. Sher cannot represent the minor-Plaintiff,
Anthony Sher’s, distinct rights and cannot state a claim on his behalf; and
The minor-Plaintiff, Anthony Sher’s claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
Plaintiffs’ request to appoint counsel for Anthony Sher is hereby DENIED.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?