HOMEL v. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

Filing 61

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 12/21/11. 12/21/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SANDY M. HOMEL
v.
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-1996

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2011, upon consideration of defendant
Centennial School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 49) and the
plaintiff’s response, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART.
It is FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1.

The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the plaintiff’s First

Amendment retaliation cause of action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Count I of the
Second Amended Complaint; the age discrimination cause of action brought under the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., in Count III; the §
1983, Title VII, and PHRA sex discrimination causes of action regarding her claims that the
defendant failed to promote her to assistant superintendent in 2007 and required the
elementary school principals to report directly to the superintendent in 2009; and the Title
VII and PHRA sex discrimination causes of action regarding her claim that the defendant
failed to promote her to superintendent in 2009.

2.

In all other respects, the motion is DENIED.

3.

Judgment will be entered upon conclusion of the trial.

/s/ Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.