NUYANNES v. THOMPSON et al

Filing 66

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/22/2012. 10/23/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANT AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) (sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID NUYANNES, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLE THOMPSON, ESQUIRE, SCOTT GALLOWAY, ESQUIRE; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2029 MEMORANDUM AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Scott Galloway’s Motion to Compel Documents (Docket No. 63) and Lauren Kane, Esquire’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 64), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: 1. Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, Lauren Kane shall produce all nonprivileged documents—i.e. documents not covered by either the attorney-client or attorney work-product privileges—regarding her representation of Plaintiff David Nuyannes. 2. Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, Lauren Kane shall also produce a privilege log detailing any responsive documents retained on grounds of privilege. 1 It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J. 1 The Court acknowledges Defendant Galloway’s argument that Plaintiff has waived the attorney-client privilege by attaching correspondence from Ms. Kane to his initial disclosures, by not objecting to the subpoena to Ms. Kane, and by placing privileged documents at issue in this litigation. Absent a specific waiver from Plaintiff, however, the Court declines to compel Ms. Kane to produce these documents. Nonetheless, following receipt and review of Ms. Kane’s client file and privilege log, Defendant Galloway shall have the opportunity to re-raise this issue and identify for the Court which documents on the privilege log it believes are not privileged.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?