M.R. et al v. RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Filing 24

ORDER THAT M.R. AND J.R.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED. RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 8/13/12. 8/13/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ______________________________________ M.R. and J.R., Parents of minor : child, E.R., : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT : Defendant. : ____________________________________: CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2235 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the “Motion of M.R. and J.R. Parents of Minor Child E.R., for Judgment on the Pleadings” (Doc. No. 8) and the responses and replies thereto; “Defendant Ridley School District’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings” (Doc. No. 15) and the responses and replies thereto; and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. M.R. and J.R.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, such that: - Defendant Ridley School District shall pay the costs of E.R.’s placement at the Benchmark School, including transportation, from April 21, 2009 through the exhaustion of all appeals from the decision of the Administrative Hearing Officer; - Counsel for the parties are directed to confer and attempt to reach a stipulation as to the amounts due within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Counsel may request a hearing if a stipulation cannot be reached; - Any petition for counsel fees shall be submitted after entry of a final order determining the amounts due for the pendent placement. 2. Ridley School District’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. WHEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of M.R. and J.R. and against Ridley School District. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ____________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?