QUINN v. CINTRON et al
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 24) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MICHAEL RAFFERTY AND RUSSELL SHOEMAKER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF PETER QUINN ON COUNTS II AND V OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COM PLAINT. MATTER IS LISTED FOR TRIAL TO COMMENCE ON 11/12/13 AT 10:00AM. MOTIONS IN LIMINE DUE 10/28/13. PLAINTIFFS PRETRIAL MEMORANDA DUE 10/28/13. DEFENDANTS PRETRIAL MEMORANDA 10/28/13. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/3/13. 10/4/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER QUINN
v.
TAMIKA CINTRON, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-02471
ORDER
AND NOW this 3rd day of October, 2013, upon consideration of the motion for partial
summary judgment by defendants Michael Rafferty and Russell Shoemaker (Dkt. No. 24) and
the response of plaintiff Peter Quinn (Dkt. No. 27), and consistent with the accompanying
memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that defendants’ motion is GRANTED. JUDGMENT is
entered in favor of defendants Michael Rafferty and Russell Shoemaker and against plaintiff
Peter Quinn on Counts II and V of plaintiff’s amended complaint.
It is further ORDERED that:
1) This matter is listed for trial to commence on Tuesday, November 12, 2013 at
10:00AM in Courtroom 4A of the United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2) Motions in limine or other matters requiring the Court’s attention, if any, are to be
filed no later than October 28, 2013. Responses to any such motions shall be filed on
or before November 4, 2013; and
3) Pretrial memoranda and proposed points for charge and verdict sheets should be filed
no later than October 28, 2013
If the parties believe a settlement conference would be productive they should contact my deputy
Mr. Charles Ervin (267-299-7559) promptly.
_____/s/ Thomas N. O’Neill Jr.________
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?