FRATZ v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. et al

Filing 51

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 10/16/12. 10/17/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES FRATZ, INDIVIDUALLY
AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiff,

v.
GOLDMAN & WARSHAW, P.C.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-cv-02577

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s “Motion for
Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 23), Plaintiff’s “Motion for Class Certification” (Doc. No. 21),
Defendant’s “Response to the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for
Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 31), the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in
this Court’s Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED;

2.

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Class Certification” (Doc. No. 21) is DENIED; and

3.

Defendant’s “Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 31) is
GRANTED, such that Plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e, and the Fair Credit Extension

-1-

Uniformity Act (FCEUA), 73 P.S. § 2270.1, et seq. are DISMISSED.
Defendant’s Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
____________________________
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

-2-