NEW-HOWARD et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Filing
55
ORDER THAT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO DEFT ON PLFFS' CLAIM UNDER THE PA FAIR CREDIT EXTENSION UNIFORMITY ACT. THE CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO DEFT ON PLFFS' CLAIM UNDER SEC. 201-2(4)(iii) & 201-2(4) (xiv) OF THE PA UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW. THESE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED ON PLFFS' CLAIM UNDER SEC. 201-2(4)(xxi) OF THE LAW. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO DEFT ON PLFFS' CLAIM UNDER THE FEDERAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT. THE CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 11/18/13. 11/20/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFFS.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEONNE NEW-HOWARD and EDGAR HOWARD,:
:
Plaintiffs, :
:
v.
:
:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.,
:
:
Defendant. :
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-cv-2855
ORDER
AND NOW, this
18th
day of November, 2013, upon
consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 24), which was renewed by Order of this Court as to the
Woolston Avenue Loan only (Doc. No. 51) and Plaintiff’s Response
letter to the Court dated October 29, 2013 (Doc. No. 52), it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) Summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendant on Plaintiffs’
claim under the Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension Uniformity
Act. The claim is dismissed with prejudice.
(2) Summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendant on Plaintiffs’
claim under § 201-2(4)(iii) and § 201-2(4)(xiv) of the
Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
These claims are dismissed with prejudice. Summary judgement is
DENIED on Plaintiffs’ claim under § 201-2(4)(xxi) of the Law.
(3) Summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendant on Plaintiffs’
claim under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The
claim is dismissed with prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?