NEW-HOWARD et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Filing 81

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO AMEND IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. PLFF MAY AMEND HER COMPLAINT TO ASSERT A CLAIM FOR BREACH OF THE FEBRUARY 2013 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PLFF & JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ETC. PLFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/12/14. 8/13/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFFS.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NEW-HOWARD, ET. AL.

:
:
Plaintiffs, :
:
v.
:
:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
:
:
Defendant. :

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-cv-2855

ORDER
AND NOW, this

12th

day of August, 2014, upon

consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 71),
Defendant’s Response thereto (Doc. No. 72), Plaintiff’s Petition
for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 75) and Defendant’s
Memorandum of Law in opposition thereto (Doc. Nos. 78, 79), it is
hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part.
Plaintiff may amend her Complaint to assert a claim for
breach of the February 2013 Settlement Agreement between
Plaintiff and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Count Four”).
Plaintiff may not amend her Complaint to assert other claims.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.