DOBIE v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; DOBIE'S BRIEF AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR REVIEW 11 , IS DENIED; ASTRUE'S DECISION IN THIS MATTER IS AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g); AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 1/23/12. 1/23/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2012, upon careful
and independent consideration of plaintiff Eddie Dobie’s brief
and statement of issues in support of request for review (docket
entry # 11), defendant Michael J. Astrue's response thereto
(docket entry # 14), the Honorable Linda K. Caracappa’s report
and recommendation (docket entry # 16), to which neither party
filed an objection within the period specified by Loc. R. Civ. P.
72.1 IV (b), and the Court agreeing with Judge Caracappa that the
Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) below did not err by failing to
afford the opinion of Dr. Roger Rothenberger adequate weight, and
that the ALJ’s decision was therefore supported by substantial
evidence, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Judge Caracappa’s report and recommendation
(docket entry # 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Dobie’s brief and statement of issues in support
of request for review (docket entry # 11) is DENIED;
Astrue’s decision in this matter is AFFIRMED
pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?