YARNALL v. THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

Filing 225

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION IN LIMINE [ECF 179] IS DENIED AS FOLLOWS: THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST THAT THE COURT ENTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT III IN FAVOR OF RAY PURSUANT TO RU LE 56(F) OF THE FRCP IS DENIED. THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST THAT PLAINTIFFS BE PRECLUDED FROM OFFERING EVIDENCE RELATING TO RODNEY BRADLEY'S ALLEGED ACTIVITIES IS DENIED. THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST FOR SEPARATE TRIALS PURSUANT TO RULE 42(B) OF THE FRCP IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/31/15. 3/31/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO RAY.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COLLEEN YARNALL et al. v. THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3130 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Philadelphia School District’s Motion in Limine (ECF No. 179), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (ECF No. 182), Defendant Philadelphia School District’s Reply in Support (ECF No. 190) and Supplemental Brief in Further Support (ECF No. 205), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Response in Opposition (ECF No. 212), and the oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Philadelphia School District’s Motion in Limine (ECF No. 179) is DENIED as follows: 1. The Philadelphia School District’s request that the Court enter summary judgment on Count III in favor of Ray pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED. 2. The Philadelphia School District’s request that Plaintiffs be precluded from offering evidence relating to Rodney Bradley’s alleged activities is DENIED. 3. The Philadelphia School District’s request for separate trials pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ L. Felipe Restrepo L. FELIPE RESTREPO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?