BROWN v. ASTRUE
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVERSAL IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g).SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/1/12. 5/3/12 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
:
ANGELA J. BROWN,
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
v.
:
NO. 11-3251
:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
:
Commissioner of Social Security,
:
Defendant.
:
____________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of May 2012, after careful review and independent
consideration of Plaintiff’s request for review, Defendant’s response, the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice, the objections to the Report
and Recommendation and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Objections to Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3.
The Plaintiff’s request for reversal is GRANTED; and
4.
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further review consistent with
the Report and Recommendation and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion pursuant to the
fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
_____________________
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?