WASHINGTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
13
ORDER THAT THE CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART; COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AGAINST ALL DEFTS; PLFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDMENT TO CURE DEFECTS IN COUNTS I & III BY 1/25/2012, ETC. BY 1/25/2012, PLFF SHALL SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY WE SHOULD NOT DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE HIS CLAIMS AGAINST THE JOHN DOE OFFICER DEFTS PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 4(m).SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 1/11/12. 1/11/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO UNREPRESENTED PARTY.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH WASHINGTON
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-3275
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2012, upon
consideration of plaintiff’s complaint (docket entry # 1),
defendant City of Philadelphia’s (the “City”) motion to dismiss
(docket entry # 4), and plaintiff’s response thereto (docket
entry # 6), and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum,
it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The City’s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 4) is
GRANTED IN PART;
2.
Count II of the complaint is DISMISSED against all
defendants;
3.
Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file an amendment to
cure defects in Counts I and III by January 25, 2012, or we will
dismiss with prejudice these Counts against the City for failure
to state a claim; and
4.
By January 25, 2012, Plaintiff shall SHOW GOOD
CAUSE why we should not dismiss without prejudice his claims
against the John Doe officer defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 4(m).
BY THE COURT:
__\s\Stewart Dalzell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?