FRINTNER v. TRUEPOSITION, INC.

Filing 42

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 1) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOCKET NOS. 32, 34 AND 35) ARE GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/27/12. 8/27/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARY FRINTNER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRUEPOSITION,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 11-3454

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and motion in support (Docket Nos. 23, 24), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto
(Docket No. 28), Defendant’s Motions in Limine and supporting documents (Docket Nos. 32, 33,
34, 35) and Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (Docket Nos. 38, 39, 40), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part. Counts I and II of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket No.
1) are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED as to
Count III of Plaintiff’s Complaint;

2.

Defendant’s Motions in Limine (Docket Nos. 32, 34, 35) are GRANTED without
prejudice.1
BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

As discussed more fully in the accompanying memorandum, Ms. Frintner may
request permission to introduce any or all of the excluded evidence at trial and will be given an
opportunity to argue for the admissibility of the evidence in the context of trial developments.
1