UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAUR

Filing 22

ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC #11) IS DENIED, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/19/12. ) 7/19/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMANJEET KAUR,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-3868

ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th

day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant’s

motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 11), the government’s response in
opposition (Doc. No. 12), and the defendant’s reply thereto (Doc. No. 13), and following
oral argument on the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 11)
is DENIED as follows:
1.

The defendant’s statute of limitations, collateral estoppel, and waiver

eligibility arguments are without merit and her motion for judgment on the pleadings on
these issues is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.
2.

The defendant’s argument that Ms. Kaur did not procure her citizenship

through an illegality is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-raise the issue after
conducting discovery.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.