UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
Filing
12
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO REMAND IN C.A. 11-3925 AND 11-4913 ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART AS FOLLOWS: C.A. 11-3925 IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA; C.A. 11-4913 IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA; THE MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/17/2013; 4/18/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER # 3210 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDLN0.1871
07-MD-01871
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. v. GSK
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3925
and
CIVIL ACTION NO.ll-4913
HUMANA HEALTH PLAN, INC. v. GSK
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of April2013, upon consideration of the Motions for Remand
and the opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part as follows:
1.
UnitedHealth Group. Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline. LLC, Civil Action No. 11-3925, is
REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas ofPhiladelphia County, Pennsylvania, where it
was filed at December Term 2010, No. 2871.
2.
Humana Health Plan. Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline. LLC, Civil Action No. 11-4913, is
REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas ofPhiladelphia County, Pennsylvania, where it
was filed at June Term 2011, No. 3270.
3.
The motion for fees and costs is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?