FRAZIER v. HENRY H. OTTENS MFG. CO., INC. et al
Filing
18
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S RACIALLY HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM, DENIED AS MOOT AS TO ALL CLAIMS INDIVIDUALLY ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT CHUCK JONES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/4/12. 4/5/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES FRAZIER,
Plaintiff,
v.
HENRY H. OTTENS MFG. CO., INC.,
d/b/a OTTENS FLAVORS, and
CHUCK JONES and ROBBIN NEJAD
and GINO FABIONERI,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-3987
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 13), and Defendants’
Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (Docket No. 16), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is:
1.
DENIED as to Plaintiff’s racially hostile work environment claim;
2.
DENIED AS MOOT as to all claims individually asserted against Defendant Chuck
Jones.1
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
1
By stipulation of the parties dated February 24, 2012 (Docket No. 14), the Court entered an
Order (Docket No. 15) dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted against Chuck Jones as an individual
defendant in this suit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?