FRAZIER v. HENRY H. OTTENS MFG. CO., INC. et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S RACIALLY HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM, DENIED AS MOOT AS TO ALL CLAIMS INDIVIDUALLY ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT CHUCK JONES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/4/12. 4/5/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. HENRY H. OTTENS MFG. CO., INC., d/b/a OTTENS FLAVORS, and CHUCK JONES and ROBBIN NEJAD and GINO FABIONERI, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3987 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 13), and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (Docket No. 16), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is: 1. DENIED as to Plaintiff’s racially hostile work environment claim; 2. DENIED AS MOOT as to all claims individually asserted against Defendant Chuck Jones.1 It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J. 1 By stipulation of the parties dated February 24, 2012 (Docket No. 14), the Court entered an Order (Docket No. 15) dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted against Chuck Jones as an individual defendant in this suit.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?