MIGLIORE v. ACKERMAN et al

Filing 49

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 44 ), TREATED BY THE COURT AS A MOITON FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DATED 8/12/2013, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE IN DUE COURSE FOR THE PURPOSE OF SCHEDULING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/17/2014. 6/17/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD W. MIGLIORE, J.D.,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
ROBERT L. ARCHIE, JR., ESQUIRE,
Chairman;
DENISE MCGREGOR ARMBRISTER;
JOSEPH A. DWORETZKY, ESQUIRE;
LUCY FERIA, Regional Superintendent;
JAMES DOUGLASS, Assistant Regional
Superintendent;
ESTELLE G. MATTHEWS, Chief Talent
Development Officer;
ANDREW ROSEN, ESQUIRE, Human
Resources Representative;
ARLENE ACKERMAN, Superintendent;
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
PHILADELPHIA;
THE SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION;
JOHNNY IRIZARRY;
MARY SANDRA DEAN, Principal;
Defendants.

NO. 11-4018

ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for
Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) (Document No. 44, filed February
18, 2014), treated by the Court as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Memorandum and
Order dated August 12, 2013, (2) Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Judgment on His Due Process Claims (Document No. 45, filed March 7, 2014), (3) Plaintiff’s
Reply to Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 54(b) (Document No. 46, filed March 20, 2014), and (4) Defendants’ Surreply to
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment on His Due Process Clause (Document No. 47, filed
March 27, 2014), for the reasons stated in the Memorandum dated June 17, 2014, IT IS

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
54(b), treated by the Court as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Memorandum and
Order dated August 12, 2013, is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will conduct a conference by telephone in
due course for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

2