FEEKO et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 11/18/14. 11/19/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBIN FEEKO; NELIDA MARENGO; and
PFIZER, INC. and WYETH SPECIAL
TRANSACTION SEVERANCE PLAN
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, after consideration of the Administrative
Record (paper no. 39), defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (paper
no. 40), plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 41), defendants’ Response in
Opposition to plaintiffs’ motion (paper no. 42), and plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to
defendants’ motion (paper no. 43), and after oral argument at which the parties were heard, and
for the reasons stated in the attached memorandum of today’s date, it is ORDERED that:
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (paper no. 40) is
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 41) is DENIED.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?