FEEKO et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al

Filing 49

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 11/18/14. 11/19/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBIN FEEKO; NELIDA MARENGO; and JANET RODGERS v. PFIZER, INC. and WYETH SPECIAL TRANSACTION SEVERANCE PLAN : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4296 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, after consideration of the Administrative Record (paper no. 39), defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (paper no. 40), plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 41), defendants’ Response in Opposition to plaintiffs’ motion (paper no. 42), and plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to defendants’ motion (paper no. 43), and after oral argument at which the parties were heard, and for the reasons stated in the attached memorandum of today’s date, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (paper no. 40) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 41) is DENIED. /s/ Norma L. Shapiro J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?