FURMAN v. SAUERS et al
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR RELIEF IS DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/23/21. 3/24/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(rf, )
Case 2:11-cv-04342-JD Document 60 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CERRONE FURMAN,
CIVIL ACTION
Petitioner,
v.
DEBRA K. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA; and, THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents.
NO. 11-4342
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2021, upon consideration of Pro Se Petitioner’s
Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7)
(Document No. 51, filed July 20, 2018) and Response to Motion for Relief from Judgment
Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Document No. 55, filed February 12, 2021), for the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum dated March 22, 2021, IT IS ORDERED that Pro Se Petitioner’s
Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7) is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue because
reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural ruling with respect to
pro se petitioner’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484
(2000).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?