FURMAN v. SAUERS et al
ORDER THAT PRO SE PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR RELIEF SEEKING EQUITABLE RELIEF PURSUANT TO F. R. CIV. P. 60(B)(6) & (7) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE BECAUSE REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD NOT DEBATE THE PROPRIETY OF THIS COURTS PROCEDURAL RULING WITH RESPECT TO PRO SE PETITIONERS CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/4/21. 6/4/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEBRA K. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA; and, THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2021, upon consideration of Pro Se Petitioner’s
Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7)
(Document No. 51, filed July 20, 2018), Response to Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant
to Rule 60(b) (Document No. 55, filed February 12, 2021), and Reply to Respondent’s Response
to Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) & (d) (Document No. 65, filed May
3, 2021), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated June 4, 2021, IT IS
ORDERED that Pro Se Petitioner’s Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to
F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue because
reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural ruling with respect to
pro se petitioner’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?