WADE v. DONAHOE
Filing
13
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 AND THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; AND THE PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE, IF SHE SO DESIRES, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO HER CLAIMS BROUGHT UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 NO LATER THAN 10/5/2012. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/4/12. 9/5/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP.(ti, ) Modified on 9/5/2012 (ti, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA WADE
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-3795
-----------------------------------------------PATRICIA WADE
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-4584
ORDER
NOW, this 4th day of September, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Document No. 14) and the
plaintiff’s response, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART.
It is FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1.
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED;
2.
The defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;
3.
The plaintiff’s complaints are DISMISSED; and
4.
The plaintiff is granted leave to file, if she so desires, an amended complaint
as to her claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 no later than
October 5, 2012.
/s/ Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?