SCHIMELPFENIG et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED et al

Filing 85

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 3/27/17. 3/27/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ex rel. SALLY SCHIMELPFENIG and
JOHN SEGURA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES
LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-4607

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended
Complaint (Dkt No. 26), Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
(Dkt. Nos. 50 and 51), all responses, replies thereto (Dkt Nos. 53, 54, 59, 61, and 64), and all
supplemental briefing (Dkt Nos. 67-1, 80, and 83), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions
to Dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs are granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file a Third
Amended Complaint. Should Plaintiffs fail to file said amendment, the claim will be dismissed with
prejudice.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
C. Darnell Jones, II

J.