JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
Filing
69
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 62 ) IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY, WITH PREJUDICE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER. ANY REMAINING PENDING PETITIONS, MOTIONS, AND REQUESTS FILED BY PLAINTIFF ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATITICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/25/2015. 3/26/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CLIFTON-JEREL: JONES
Plaintiff,
v.
PHILADELPHIA PARKING
AUTHORITY, et al.
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-4699
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion of
Defendant, City of Philadelphia (“City”), to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (ECF
Document 62), Defendant’s brief in support thereof, and plaintiff’s opposition thereto, for
reasons given in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Document 62) is GRANTED, and this case
is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, in accordance with this Order;
2. Any remaining pending petitions, motions, and requests filed by plaintiff are
DISMISSED as moot;
3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
s/ L. Felipe Restrepo
--------------------------------------------L. FELIPE RESTREPO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?