JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al

Filing 69

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 62 ) IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY, WITH PREJUDICE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER. ANY REMAINING PENDING PETITIONS, MOTIONS, AND REQUESTS FILED BY PLAINTIFF ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATITICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/25/2015. 3/26/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLIFTON-JEREL: JONES Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4699 ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant, City of Philadelphia (“City”), to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (ECF Document 62), Defendant’s brief in support thereof, and plaintiff’s opposition thereto, for reasons given in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Document 62) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, in accordance with this Order; 2. Any remaining pending petitions, motions, and requests filed by plaintiff are DISMISSED as moot; 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: s/ L. Felipe Restrepo --------------------------------------------L. FELIPE RESTREPO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?