NYCE v. STERLING CREDIT CORPORATION
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 4/2/2013. 4/4/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(uh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STERLING CREDIT CORPORATION,
AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment as to All Claims and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof (Document
No. 28, filed September 28, 2012), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Document No. 29, filed October 19, 2012), and Defendant Sterling
Corporation’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 32,
filed November 2, 2012), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated April 2, 2013, IT
IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Claims and
Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Nyce’s §1692c(c) claim to the extent
the claim is based on communications that occurred before August 8, 2010. The Motion is
DENIED to the extent the claim is based on communications that occurred on or after August 8,
The Motion is DENIED with respect to Nyce’s §1692d claim;
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Nyce’s §1692c(a)(1) claim; and
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Nyce’s §1692f claim.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be convened in due
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
JAN E. DuBOIS, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?