HENDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 83

ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. PLAINTIFF MAY RE-FILE HER CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY WITHIN 21 DAYS OR WITHIN THE APPLICABLE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS, WHICHEVER IS LATER. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/1//13. 8/2/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) Modified on 8/2/2013 (ti, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VICTORIA HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-5384

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of August 2013, upon consideration of the City of
Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss, to which no response has been filed, and for the reasons stated
in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff may re-file her claims against the City within 21 days or within the applicable statute of
limitations, whichever is later. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
_______________________
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.