THOMPSON et al v. KULICKE KONECRANES GMBH et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT IMG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW (#26) IS GRANTED. ANY PENDING MOTIONS NOT REFERENCED IN THIS ORDER ARE DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAN D (#8) IS GRANTED, AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REMAND THE FILE TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/3/12. 8/3/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.[FDC]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RUSSELL THOMPSON and
THOMASINA THOMPSON, H/W,

:
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
v.
:
:
KULICKE KONECRANES GMBH, et al., :
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-5410

ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Remand (Doc. No. 8), the Response in Opposition filed by Defendant Ingenieurtechnik und
Maschinenbau GMBH (“IMG”) (Doc. No. 12), the Response in Opposition filed by Defendant
Reading Crane and Engineering Company (“Reading Crane”) (Doc. No. 14), the Supplemental
Memoranda of Law filed by Plaintiffs’, Defendant IMG, and Defendant Reading Crane (Doc.
Nos. 23, 24, and 25), and Defendant IMG’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Memorandum of
Law (Doc. No. 26), and the arguments made by counsel for the parties at the October 28, 2011
hearing, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Defendant IMG’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Plaintiffs’ Supplemental
Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED.

2.

Any pending motions not referenced in this Order are DENIED AS MOOT.

3.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court
is directed to remand the file to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia
County.

4.

The Clerk of Court shall close the case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J.
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.