COLLURA v. DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT et al
Filing
19
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS (DOCKET NOS. 7 AND 8) ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 11) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/20/13. 8/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TOPRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO ALL COUNSEL.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
JASON COLLURA,
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE
:
SUPREME COURT OF
:
PENNSYLVANIA, et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
____________________________________:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-5637
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Mark
Maguire’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 7), Plaintiff’s response thereto (Docket No. 12),
Defendants’ The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Donna M. Snyder,
and Paul Burogyne’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8), and Plaintiff’s response thereto (Docket
No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ Motions (Docket Nos. 7, 8) are GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 11) is DENIED;
3. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including
statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?