BOARDAKAN RESTAURANT LLC et al v. ATLANTIC PIER ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
Filing
250
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON COUNTS I, II, IV AND V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/24/16. 10/25/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BOARDAKAN RESTAURANT LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-5676
v.
GORDON GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of October 2016, in accordance with the Opinion of the Court
issued this day, it is ORDERED that:
1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Gordon Group Holdings, LLC, Pier
Developers, Inc., Sheldon Gordon, Scott Gordon, and Peter J. Fine and against Plaintiffs
Boardakan Restaurant LLC, and Oceanental Restaurant, LLC on Count I (Fraud).
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Gordon Group Holdings, LLC, Pier
Developers, Inc., Sheldon Gordon, Scott Gordon, and Peter J. Fine and against Plaintiffs
Boardakan Restaurant LLC, and Oceanental Restaurant, LLC on Count II (Negligent
Misrepresentation).
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Gordon Group Holdings, LLC, Pier
Developers, Inc., Sheldon Gordon, Scott Gordon, and Peter J. Fine and against Plaintiffs
Boardakan Restaurant LLC, and Oceanental Restaurant, LLC on Count IV (Promissory
Estoppel).
4. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Gordon Group Holdings, LLC, Pier
Developers, Inc., Sheldon Gordon, Scott Gordon, and Peter J. Fine and against Plaintiffs
Boardakan Restaurant LLC, and Oceanental Restaurant, LLC on Count V (Alter Ego).
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close the above-captioned case for
statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?