MARTIN v. ASTRUE

Filing 22

ORDER THAT REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED; & THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLFF & AGAINST DEFT & SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/27/12. 11/27/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LIZA MARTIN, on behalf of G.L.V., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-5955 O R D E R AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the parties’ briefs and the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;1 2. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED; and 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 1 Neither party filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT2 and shall mark this case as closed for statistical purposes. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. _s/Eduardo C. Robreno____ EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 2 In a sentence four case, “[t]he district court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or revising the decision of the Secretary, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. . . .” Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 n.1 (1993) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006)). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?