SCOTT v. SUNOCO LOGISTICS PARTNERS, LP

Filing 29

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF No. 28) that THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS SUNOCO LOGISTICS PARTNERS, LP, KIMBERLY LEGGE AND MICHELLE ACHENBACH FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 22) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS:. SUNOCO'S MOT ION FOR SUMMARY JUGMENT AGAINST SCOTT ON ALL OF HER CLAIMS IS GRANTED; AND. SUNOCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN ITS FAVOR ON ALL OF ITS COUNTERCLAIMS IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 1/8/2013. 1/9/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADRIENNE SCOTT, : Plaintiff, v. SUNOCO LOGISTICS PARTNERS, LP, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 11-6284 ORDER AND NOW, this __9th ___ day of __January_____, 2013, it is ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Sunoco Logistics Partners, LP, Kimberly Legge and Michelle Achenbach for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: C Sunoco’s motion for summary judgment against Scott on all of her claims is GRANTED; and C Sunoco’s motion for summary judgment in its favor on all of its counterclaims is DENIED. s/Anita B. Brody _________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. COPIES VIA ECF ON TO: COPIES MAILED ON TO:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?