ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #6) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 8/8/12. ) 8/9/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NASHEEN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6318 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’1 Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 6), and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 7), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Given Plaintiff’s express withdrawl in his Response in Opposition of all claims against Officers Lugo and Dougherty, as well as his withdrawl of his assault and battery and excessive force claims against Officer Fuentez, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Officers Lugo and Dougherty on all claims asserted against them and in favor of Officer Fuentez on the assault and battery and excessive force claims asserted against him; 2. The remainder of Defendants’ Motion is DENIED in its entirety. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J. 1 The moving Defendants listed in the aforementioned Motion are: the City of Philadelphia, Sergeant Connell, Officer Fuentez, Officer Lackey, Officer Lugo, Officer Dougherty, Officer Quiles, and Officer Wright. On July 9, 2012, the parties entered into a stipulation—which the Court signed and approved—that all counts against the City of Philadelphia and Officers Dougherty and Lugo would be dropped and that these parties would be dismissed as defendants from suit. Moreover, Defendants’ instant Motion for Summary Judgment does not include either Officer Hoover or Officer Hazzard as one of the moving officers. As such, the Court will presume that Defendants do not seek summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claims as applied to either of these officers, and all claims against them shall therefore proceed to trial.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?