KUBIAK v. HARRIS et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT KUBIAK'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED. KUBIAK'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 5/29/12. 5/29/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
:
ALBERT A. KUBIAK,
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
No. 11-6337
:
STACEY HARRIS, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
__________________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2012, after consideration of Plaintiff, Albert
A. Kubiak’s (“Kubiak”), Motion for Reconsideration, Defendants, Stacey Harris, Leslie Cain,
and Dominic Butterline’s (collectively, “Defendants”), Motion for Protective Order and
Sanctions, Kubiak’s Motion for Sanctions, and the numerous Responses and Replies of the
parties, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Kubiak’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED;

2.

Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED;

3.

Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; and

4.

Kubiak’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE