LEWIS v. HECKLER

Filing 13

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 6) IS GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT III IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO REASSERT THE CLAIMS THEREIN IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT FORUM. PLAINTIFF 'S MOTION IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 5/10/2012. 5/10/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) Modified on 5/11/2012 (afm, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JUNIATA LEWIS v. DAVID HECKLER : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6492 ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant David Heckler’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket No. 6) and Plaintiff Juanita Lewis’s First Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 10), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. Counts I and II are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Count III is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s right to reassert the claims therein in an appropriate state court forum. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case closed. BY THE COURT: /s/John R. Padova John R. Padova, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?