PARKER v. ASTRUE
Filing
16
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. JUDGMENT WILL BE ENTERED REVERSIN THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SEDURITY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REMAND ONLY, AND THE RELIEF SOUGHT BY PLFF IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/9/12. ) 11/14/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KYRAN PARKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-6558
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Brief
Statement of Issues in Support of his Request for Review (Doc. No. 9), Defendant’s Response to
the Request for Review (Doc. No. 11), and Plaintiff’s Reply thereto (Doc. No. 12), and after
careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth
T. Hey (Doc. No. 14), to which no objections were filed pursuant to Local Rule of Civil
Procedure 72.1.IV, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2.
Judgment will be entered REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of
Social Security for the purposes of this remand only, and the relief sought by
Plaintiff is GRANTED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED to the
Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further
proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation;
3.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including
statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?