CHAMBERS v. PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER et al

Filing 80

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS, JAMES STOKES AND LORRAINE GENNARO'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 69) AND DEFENDANT, PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NEWORK'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 70)ARE GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/12/13. 9/12/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JERRY CHAMBERS, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
PHILADELPHIA MEDIA
NETWORK, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-6589

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff Jerry
Chambers, Sr.’s Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 66), the Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendants James Stokes and Lorraine Gennaro (Docket No. 69), the Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendant Philadelphia Media Network, Inc. (Docket No. 70), and Mr. Chambers’s response
thereto (Docket No. 76), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
hereby ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge

1