UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AMABILE

Filing 51

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER (DOC. 43) IS GRANTED. PARTIES SHALL APPEAR AT A HEARING REGARDING MR. AMABILE'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE 12/20/11 AND 4/12/12 ORDERS OF THIS COURT ON 6/26/12 AT 10:00AM, ETC. DEFENDANTS FILINGS (DOCS. 46,47,48 & 49) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/4/12. 6/4/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANT, EMAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
MATTHEW LOPES REVENUE
OFFICER, INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE
v.
MICHAEL J. AMABILE

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-6591
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-6592

ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the United States of
America’s Motion to Enforce a Court Order (Dkt. No. 43) and defendant Michael J. Amabile’s
response thereto (Dkt. No. 45), it is ORDERED that the United States of America’s motion is
GRANTED and the parties shall appear at a hearing regarding Mr. Amabile’s failure to comply
with the December 20, 2011 and April 12, 2012 Orders of this Court on Tuesday, June 26 at
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4A of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Further, upon consideration of defendant Michael J. Amabile’s: (1) Affidavit Filed in
Support of His May 22, 2012 Letter Informing the Court that Plaintiffs and Their Alleged
Attorneys Susan R. Becker, Mary Catherine Frye, and Margaret L. Hutchinson May Have
Engaged in Witness Tampering in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(2)(A) and (b)(1) (Dkt. No.
46); (2) Follow-Up Letter to the Court Requesting that the Court Identify on the Record All Facts
That Were Silently Judicially Noticed (Dkt. No. 47); (3) Letter of Inquiry to the Court
Requesting Senior Judge Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. to Confirm That Since His Appointment As a
U.S. District Court Judge and a Senior Judge, He Has Obeyed and is Obeying the Residence

Requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 134 (Dkt. No. 48); and (4) 2nd Memorandum of Law Filed in
Opposition to Plaintiff's Proposed Order and Combined Motion (Dkt. No. 49), it is ORDERED
that all of the above-listed pleadings are DENIED.

s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

-2-