CINTAO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOCUMENT NO. 4) IS GRANTED, AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1447 (c), TO THE STATE COURT FROM WHICH IT WAS REMOVED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 12/14/11. 12/14/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND CERTIFIED COPIES MAILED TO COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.(lisad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ISABELLA CINTAO, a minor, by
MARIA PINO and TOMAS CINTAO,
Guardians and MARIA PINO and TOMAS
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s
Motion to Remand (Document No. 4), the defendant’s response, and after oral argument,
it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the state court from which it was removed.
/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?