APOLLO v. PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY 15 IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 12 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM. ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 6/18/12. 6/21/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MADELINE APOLLO, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6684 Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this ___ day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 13); Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Plaintiff’s Response; (Doc. 15); and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. 15, Ex. A), and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1) Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. 2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 3) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff’s equal protection claim. 4) All of Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker __________________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?