KE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 223

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION TO AMEND (DOC. NO. 133 ), IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 159 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/4/2013. 10/4/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LEI KE,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-6708

v.
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Reconsideration of the Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 133), Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 134),
Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. No. 138), Plaintiff’s Letter, dated August 11, 2013 (Doc. No. 207),
Defendant’s Letter, dated August 26, 2013 (Doc. No. 205), Plaintiff’s Letter, dated August 28,
2013 (Doc. No. 178), Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No.
159), and Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 197), it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 133.) is
DENIED.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 159) is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

18