KE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 452

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT'S 11/27/2013 ORDER (RE: DOC. NO. 317 AND 435 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/20/2014. 3/20/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEI KE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6708 v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of March 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for Clarification of the Court's Nov. 27, 2013 Order (Doc. 317) (Doc. No. 435), it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for Clarification of the Court's Nov. 27, 2013 Order (Doc. 317) (Doc. No. 435) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court's November 27, 2013 Order (Doc. No. 317) is modified as follows: Plaintiff may ask questions at depositions regarding the information contained in the redacted student files and cross-referenced spreadsheets in accordance with the Opinion of the Court dated March 20, 2014. 2. Defendant shall provide Plaintiff with the un-redacted records of the two students who do not object to the release of their personally identifying information. 3. Defendant shall provide Plaintiff with the redacted medical school files of the students listed on the spreadsheets. 15 4. Defendants shall provide these records to Plaintiff by 5 p.m. on Friday, March 21, 2014. BY THE COURT: k{~J. 16

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?